Quixotic and Absurd!
clearscience:

Good catch, adriantumble. Of all the energy that starts on the left, 58% of it ends up as “rejected energy” on the right. That’s huge! What does this mean? Does it mean we did a bad job and wasted a bunch of energy? Well, not necessarily. Laws of the universe (the second law of thermodynamics) say there is a limit to how much of the energy on the left we can actually use. Some of it must be rejected.
adriantumble:

A great infographic. I found it interesting that transportation consumed the most energy, even more than residential and commercial combined. Not sure what “rejected energy” is on the right, but if it’s produced but unused energy, that’s pretty stunning too.
clearscience:

When talking about global energy use, a common unit to discuss is the quad. This is short for one quadrillion BTUs. In SI units that is 1.055 x 10^18 joules or 1.055 exajoules.
We’ll use the United States as an example (because data for the U.S. are easy to get). The U.S. uses 94.6 quads per year. The sources of this energy are shown on the left. 40.4% of this is used to generate electricity. The rest is used directly. The final uses are shown on the right: residential, commercial, industrial, and transportation.
You notice that petroleum is used almost entirely as a transportation fuel. If the U.S. could convert to an electric vehicle base, the flow of energy to transportation could come from the “electricity generation” box, which involves renewable sources like solar and wind. These renewables are a small fraction, but if they could be made cheaper, their fraction would increase.



This chart makes me sad. Solar energy: 0.11? Wind 0.70? Hydro: 2.68? The most renewable sources make up less than 5%… And look at those transportation numbers. Seriously people? Drive less. And Obama, make me a train, please????

clearscience:

Good catch, adriantumble. Of all the energy that starts on the left, 58% of it ends up as “rejected energy” on the right. That’s huge! What does this mean? Does it mean we did a bad job and wasted a bunch of energy? Well, not necessarily. Laws of the universe (the second law of thermodynamics) say there is a limit to how much of the energy on the left we can actually use. Some of it must be rejected.

adriantumble:

A great infographic. I found it interesting that transportation consumed the most energy, even more than residential and commercial combined. Not sure what “rejected energy” is on the right, but if it’s produced but unused energy, that’s pretty stunning too.

clearscience:

When talking about global energy use, a common unit to discuss is the quad. This is short for one quadrillion BTUs. In SI units that is 1.055 x 10^18 joules or 1.055 exajoules.

We’ll use the United States as an example (because data for the U.S. are easy to get). The U.S. uses 94.6 quads per year. The sources of this energy are shown on the left. 40.4% of this is used to generate electricity. The rest is used directly. The final uses are shown on the right: residential, commercial, industrial, and transportation.

You notice that petroleum is used almost entirely as a transportation fuel. If the U.S. could convert to an electric vehicle base, the flow of energy to transportation could come from the “electricity generation” box, which involves renewable sources like solar and wind. These renewables are a small fraction, but if they could be made cheaper, their fraction would increase.

This chart makes me sad. Solar energy: 0.11? Wind 0.70? Hydro: 2.68? The most renewable sources make up less than 5%… And look at those transportation numbers. Seriously people? Drive less. And Obama, make me a train, please????

  1. sustainableenergyz reblogged this from clearscience
  2. testberichte-waschmaschinen-2012 reblogged this from clearscience
  3. druckerpatronen-canon-mp560 reblogged this from clearscience
  4. what-is-an-slr-digital-camera reblogged this from clearscience
  5. swimsuits2012 reblogged this from quixoticandabsurd
  6. fwtistika reblogged this from clearscience
  7. singapore-tuition-centre reblogged this from clearscience
  8. yacht-charter-turkey reblogged this from clearscience
  9. solidworks-tutorial reblogged this from clearscience
  10. norris-lighthall reblogged this from clearscience
  11. thebardofavon reblogged this from clearscience
  12. quixoticandabsurd reblogged this from clearscience and added:
    This chart makes me sad. Solar energy: 0.11? Wind 0.70? Hydro: 2.68? The most renewable sources make up less than 5%…...
  13. axelhasascienceblog reblogged this from clearscience
  14. darylelockhart reblogged this from clearscience
  15. clearscience reblogged this from adriantumble and added:
    Good catch, adriantumble. Of all the energy...left, 58% of it ends up as
  16. utonesm reblogged this from clearscience
  17. julsera reblogged this from clearscience and added:
    pretty awesome graph
  18. adriantumble reblogged this from clearscience and added:
    A great infographic. I found it interesting...transportation consumed
  19. scheimann reblogged this from electricpower and added:
    When talking about global energy use, a common unit to discuss is the quad. This is short for one quadrillion BTUs. In...
  20. ultrafastx reblogged this from clearscience and added:
    function of weight and volume are a big driver in...convenience of gasoline and other...
  21. clearscience posted this